<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US Food Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com</link>
	<description>Award winning food safety blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='blog.usfoodsafety.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/osd.xml" title="US Food Safety" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Gordon Ramsay Sued Over Unpaid Wages By Employees At His Fat Cow Restaurant</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/gordon-ramsay-sued-over-unpaid-wages-by-employees-at-his-fat-cow-restaurant/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/gordon-ramsay-sued-over-unpaid-wages-by-employees-at-his-fat-cow-restaurant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gordon ramsay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restaurant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prepare for a shocker. Gordon Ramsay is being sued for mistreating his employees. Radar online is reporting that the celebrity chef known for hosting FOX reality TV shows &#8220;Kitchen Nightmares&#8221; and &#8220;Hell’s Kitchen&#8221; is facing a class action lawsuit brought by former employees of his Los Angeles restaurant The Fat Cow. The lawsuit doesn&#8217;t involve [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11354&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prepare for a shocker. Gordon Ramsay is being sued for mistreating his employees.</p>
<p>Radar online is reporting that the celebrity chef known for hosting FOX reality TV shows &#8220;Kitchen Nightmares&#8221; and &#8220;Hell’s Kitchen&#8221; is facing a class action lawsuit brought by former employees of his Los Angeles restaurant The Fat Cow. The lawsuit doesn&#8217;t involve the frank and at times verbally abusive outbursts that have made Ramsay famous, however. Rather, Ramsay faces allegations of a managerial nature, The Daily Mail points out.</p>
<p>The Fat Cow former employees Jennifer Becerra, Montinique Dever, Andrea Bourke and Lauren Benge said they were not properly compensated for overtime hours, and also were forced to work through meal times and other breaks. </p>
<p>For more on the allegations against Ramsay click over to Radar Online.</p>
<p>In April, Ramsay faced two separate lawsuits over unpaid bills, one from his accountants in New York over an outstanding $75,000 invoice and another from the company he hired to renovate the Fat Cow, which claims it is owed $45,000.</p>
<p>Of the most recent lawsuit, a spokesperson for Ramsay told Radar Online, “we are aware there was a problem with [The Fat Cow's] previous management which has since been changed, but this is totally unacceptable if any truth to it.”</p>
<p>source: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/15/gordon-ramsay-sued_n_3447604.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003&#038;ir=Food" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/15/gordon-ramsay-sued_n_3447604.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003&#038;ir=Food</a></p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/gordon-ramsay/'>gordon ramsay</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/kitchen/'>kitchen</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/restaurant/'>restaurant</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11354/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11354/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11354&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/gordon-ramsay-sued-over-unpaid-wages-by-employees-at-his-fat-cow-restaurant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Safe Is Splenda? CSPI Urges Caution for Artificial Sweetener</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/how-safe-is-splenda-cspi-urges-caution-for-artificial-sweetener/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/how-safe-is-splenda-cspi-urges-caution-for-artificial-sweetener/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[splenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The artificial sweetener sucralose (sold under the brand name Splenda) could potentially pose health risks, so it needs to be better understood before the sweetener should be assumed to be safe, one advocacy organization says. The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit watchdog group, said today that it was downgrading its safety [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11350&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The artificial sweetener sucralose (sold under the brand name Splenda) could potentially pose health risks, so it needs to be better understood before the sweetener should be assumed to be safe, one advocacy organization says.</p>
<p>The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit watchdog group, said today that it was downgrading its <a href="https://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm#sucralose">safety rating of sucralose</a> from &#8220;safe&#8221; to &#8220;caution,&#8221; meaning that the additive &#8220;may pose a risk and needs to be better tested.&#8221;</p>
<p>The change was spurred by a recent study from researchers in Italy that found that sucralose caused leukemia in mice, according to the CSPI. This study has not been published, and needs to be reviewed by other scientists to determine whether the findings are credible.</p>
<p>While sucralose may turn out to be safer than other <a href="http://www.livescience.com/1528-bitter-battle-truth-sweeteners.html">artificial sweeteners</a>, &#8220;the forthcoming Italian study warrants careful scrutiny before we can be confident that the sweetener is safe for use in food,&#8221; said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson.</p>
<p>The CSPI recommends people avoid the artificial sweeteners saccharin (Sweet &#8216;N Low), aspartame (NutraSweet and Equal), and acesulfame potassium (Sunett and Sweet One).</p>
<p>The issue of whether <a href="http://www.livescience.com/36257-aspartame-health-effects-artificial-sweetener.html">artificial sweeteners pose health risks</a> is controversial. Many of the studies showing risks, including the new Italian study, have been done in animals, and it&#8217;s not known whether the same effects would be seen in humans.</p>
<div id="ad_mid_article">In addition, rodents, like humans, may develop cancer as a result of old age, and not exposure to chemical additives. This issue has caused some to question the results of studies showing that aspartame-fed rats are at increased risk for cancer over their lifetimes.</div>
<p>Even the CSPI says that it considers drinking <a href="http://www.livescience.com/12972-diet-soda-increases-stroke-risk.html">diet soda</a>, which often contains artificial sweeteners, to be safer than drinking regular soda. Regular soda &#8220;poses the greater and demonstrable risks of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, gout, tooth decay, and other health problems,&#8221; the CSPI said in a statement.</p>
<p>To avoid both the risks of sugar and artificial sweeteners, the CSPI recommends drinking water, seltzer water, flavored unsweetened waters, seltzer mixed with some fruit juice or unsweetened iced tea.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that the CSPI also gives caffeine a safety rating of &#8220;caution.&#8221; Caffeine &#8220;keeps many people from sleeping, causes jitteriness, and affects calcium metabolism,&#8221; the CSPI says.</p>
<p>source: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/12/splenda-health-risks-cspi-leukemia-artificial-sweeteners_n_3431024.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003&amp;ir=Food">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/12/splenda-health-risks-cspi-leukemia-artificial-sweeteners_n_3431024.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003&amp;ir=Food</a></p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/chemicals/'>chemicals</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/cpsi/'>CPSI</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/safety/'>safety</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/splenda/'>splenda</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11350/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11350/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11350&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/how-safe-is-splenda-cspi-urges-caution-for-artificial-sweetener/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wellesley, MA Health Dept. Conducts E.Coli Investigation</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/wellesley-ma-health-dept-conducts-e-coli-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/wellesley-ma-health-dept-conducts-e-coli-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e coli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supermarket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wellesley Health Department (WHD) received notice by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health’s (MDPH) surveillance system on June 12, 2013 of a case of E-Coli in a Wellesley, MA  resident. The public health nurse at WHD promptly began an investigation. This investigation has expanded to include the State health department (MDPH), as well as WHD [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11345&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left">Wellesley Health Department (WHD) received notice by the Massachusetts Department of</p>
<p align="left">Public Health’s (MDPH) surveillance system on June 12, 2013 of a case of E-Coli in a Wellesley, MA </p>
<p align="left">resident.</p>
<p>The public health nurse at WHD promptly began an investigation. This investigation has</p>
<p align="left">expanded to include the State health department (MDPH), as well as WHD staff. It has been</p>
<p align="left">brought to the WHD’s attention that additional cases of E<span style="font-family:Calibri;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;">‐</span><span style="font-family:Calibri;">Coli will be included in the current</span></span></p>
<p align="left">investigation. The origin of the cases’ illness is being investigated. Rumors have been</p>
<p align="left">circulating that the cause of the illnesses has been linked to a local supermarket. At this point,</p>
<p>no local supermarkets are a focus of the investigation. WHD will provide updates as warranted.</p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/e-coli/'>e coli</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/supermarket/'>supermarket</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11345/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11345/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11345&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/wellesley-ma-health-dept-conducts-e-coli-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>See’s Candies Issues Allergy Alert on Milk and Dark Raisins Nationwide</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/sees-candies-issues-allergy-alert-on-milk-and-dark-raisins-nationwide/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/sees-candies-issues-allergy-alert-on-milk-and-dark-raisins-nationwide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raisins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[See's Candies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See’s Company of San Francisco is recalling all Milk and Dark Raisins because it may contain undeclared tree nuts and eggs. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to tree nuts (e.g.: almonds, walnuts, pecans, cashews) and/or eggs run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products. Product was [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11343&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See’s Company of San Francisco is <strong>recalling all Milk and Dark Raisins</strong> because it may contain undeclared <strong>tree nuts and eggs</strong>. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to tree nuts <strong>(e.g.: almonds, walnuts, pecans, cashews)</strong> and/or eggs run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products.</p>
<p><strong>Product</strong> was distributed <strong>nationwide</strong> through See’s Candies Retail Stores, Licensees and Mail Order. The product is sold bulk and packaged at the stores in 8oz clear cellophane bags. No illnesses have been reported to date. The product UPC are as follows: Milk Raisins UPC: 737666083060 and Dark Raisins UPC: 737666083053.</p>
<p>The recall was initiated after a retail store discovered a chocolate covered pecan in the raisin bulk pack. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused because of shared lines that produce nut containing candies. There is a potential that nut and egg residue may be present in some of the chocolate enrobed raisins.</p>
<p>Consumers who have purchased Sees’ Candies Milk or Dark Raisins and are sensitive to nuts and eggs are urged to return the raisins to the place of purchase for a full refund or exchange. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-800-789-7337 (Monday thru Friday, 8:30am to 4:30pm PDT).</p>
<p>###</p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/allergen/'>allergen</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/raisins/'>raisins</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/sees-candies/'>See's Candies</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11343/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11343/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11343&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/sees-candies-issues-allergy-alert-on-milk-and-dark-raisins-nationwide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nationwide Chocolate Bars Recall for Undeclared Allergen</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/nationwide-chocolate-bars-recall-for-undelcared-allergen/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/nationwide-chocolate-bars-recall-for-undelcared-allergen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oskri Recalls “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate”, “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate Minis”, “Fig Dark Chocolate Bars” and “Almond Dark Chocolate Bars” Because of Undeclared Milk. The recalled “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate”, “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate Minis”, “Fig Dark Chocolate Bars” and “Almond Dark Chocolate Bars” was distributed nationwide to retail stores. The product comes in a [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11339&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oskri Recalls “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate”, “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate Minis”, “Fig<br />
Dark Chocolate Bars” and “Almond Dark Chocolate Bars” Because of Undeclared Milk.</p>
<p>The recalled “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate”, “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate Minis”, “Fig Dark Chocolate Bars” and “Almond Dark Chocolate Bars” was distributed nationwide to retail stores.</p>
<p>The product comes in a 1.9 ounce, flexible plastic wrapper, UPC 666016-300703 (Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate), UPC 666016-400311 (Coconut Bars Dark Chocolate Minis), UPC 666016-300307 (Fig Dark Chocolate Bars) and UPC 666016-300420 (Almond Dark Chocolate Bars) marked with the following stamp, which can be found on the front of the wrapper:</p>
<blockquote><p>P 1/1/13 through 6/6/13<br />
EXP 7/7/14 through 12/12/14<br />
LOT 001 through 154</p></blockquote>
<p>There have not been any complaints of allergic reactions to this product.</p>
<p>The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate”, “Coconut Bar Dark Chocolate Minis”, “Fig Dark Chocolate Bars” and “Almond Dark Chocolate Bars” may contain milk in the product. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused by a temporary breakdown in the company&#8217;s production process.</p>
<p>Consumers who have purchased these products are urged to return it to Oskri for a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact Laura Pineda at Oskri’s Quality Department by emailing <a href="mailto:quality@oskri.com">quality@oskri.com</a></p>
<p>Please return products to: Oskri, 528 E. Tyranena Park Road, Lake Mills, WI 53551.</p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/allergen/'>allergen</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/chocolate/'>chocolate</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/milk/'>milk</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/recall/'>recall</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11339/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11339/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11339&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/17/nationwide-chocolate-bars-recall-for-undelcared-allergen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>8,000+ Containers of Fish Food Recalled for Salmonella Nationwide</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/13/8000-containers-of-fish-food-recalled-for-salmonella/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/13/8000-containers-of-fish-food-recalled-for-salmonella/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmonella]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hartz Mountain Corporation is recalling one specific lot of Wardley Betta Fish Food 1.2 oz. size due to concerns that one or more containers within the lot may have been potentially contaminated with Salmonella. Salmonella is a bacterial organism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in people, particularly young children, frail or [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11336&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hartz Mountain Corporation is recalling one specific lot of Wardley Betta Fish Food 1.2 oz. size due to concerns that one or more containers within the lot may have been potentially contaminated with Salmonella. </p>
<p>Salmonella is a bacterial organism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in people, particularly young children, frail or elderly people, and those with weakened immune systems. Salmonella can affect animals eating the product and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated products, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the product or any surfaces exposed to these products. Some healthy individuals infected with Salmonella may experience fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in the organism getting into the bloodstream and producing more severe or chronic illness.</p>
<p>The product was shipped nationwide from May 13, 2013 through June 4, 2013. In total, 8,112 1.2-oz. plastic containers of Wardley Betta Fish Food, UPC number 0-43324-01648, isolated to the lot code PP06331 (located on the bottom). </p>
<p>Although Hartz has not received any reports of illness to date in animals or humans as a result of coming into contact with this product, Hartz is taking immediate steps to remove the product from all retail stores and distribution centers. Fish owners who have purchased this product should check the lot code on their containers. If the code is not visible, or if the container has the following lot code PP06331 imprinted on it, they should immediately discontinue use of the product and discard in the trash.</p>
<p>Consumers can contact Hartz Consumer Affairs at 1-800-275-1414 (24 hours/day 7 days/week) with any questions they may have and to obtain reimbursement for purchased product.</p>
<p>SOURCE Hartz Mountain Corporation</p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/fish/'>fish</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/food/'>food</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/hartz/'>hartz</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/recall/'>recall</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/salmonella/'>salmonella</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11336/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11336/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11336&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/13/8000-containers-of-fish-food-recalled-for-salmonella/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muffins sold at Price Chopper Recalled for Undeclared Walnuts</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/13/muffins-sold-at-price-chopper-recalled-for-undeclared-walnuts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/13/muffins-sold-at-price-chopper-recalled-for-undeclared-walnuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Chopper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walnuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[June 12, 2013 &#8211; St. Augustine, FL (PRWEB) &#8211; Butterfly Bakery issues allergy alert on undeclared Walnuts in 14.5 ounce Butterfly Bakery Whole Grain Harvest Berry Muffins, UPC 6 43482 60014 8. This product has not been produced since November 26, 2012. The product is packed in a clear clam-shell type package with a label [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11334&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 12, 2013 &#8211; St. Augustine, FL (PRWEB) &#8211; Butterfly Bakery issues allergy alert on undeclared Walnuts in 14.5 ounce Butterfly Bakery Whole Grain Harvest Berry Muffins, UPC 6 43482 60014 8.</p>
<p>This product has not been produced since November 26, 2012.</p>
<p>The product is packed in a clear clam-shell type package with a label which also serves to seal the item.</p>
<p>No illnesses have been reported to date.</p>
<p>This recall was initiated after it was discovered that the product was still available and being sold at a single Price Chopper store located in Schenectady, NY. Management had believed that there was no more of this product in circulation since it had not been produced in more than five months and there was no existing stock of the product in possession of the bakery.</p>
<p>At this point all of this product has been removed from the shelves and is no longer available at retail. Butterfly bakery management indicated the problem with this specific retail label was that walnuts had not been included among the ingredients. Corrective steps to prevent a re-occurrence of this type of situation have been put into place.</p>
<p>Consumers are urged to return the product to the place of purchase for a full refund.</p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/allergy/'>allergy</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/price-chopper/'>Price Chopper</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/recall/'>recall</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/walnuts/'>walnuts</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11334/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11334/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11334&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/13/muffins-sold-at-price-chopper-recalled-for-undeclared-walnuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weight Loss Pills Recalled for Sibutramine, a Consumer Risk</title>
		<link>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/12/weight-loss-pills-recalled-for-sibutramine-a-consumer-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/12/weight-loss-pills-recalled-for-sibutramine-a-consumer-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>foodsafeguru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/?p=11332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bethel Nutritional Consulting, Inc. was informed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that a sample of Bethel 30 green capsule was collected and tested by FDA in April 24, 2013. The capsules tested positive for Sibutramine and Phenolphthalein. Sibutramine is a controlled substance that was removed from the market in October 2010 for safety [&#8230;]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11332&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bethel Nutritional Consulting, Inc. was informed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that a sample of Bethel 30 green capsule was collected and tested by FDA in April 24, 2013. The capsules tested positive for Sibutramine and Phenolphthalein. Sibutramine is a controlled substance that was removed from the market in October 2010 for safety reasons. The FDA has not approved Bethel 30, green capsules as drugs; therefore the safety and effectiveness of this product is unknown.</p>
<p>FDA advises that these products may pose a threat to consumers because sibutramine is known to substantially increase blood pressure and/or pulse rate in some patients and may present a significant risk for patients with a history of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias or stroke. This product may also interact, in life-threatening ways, with other medications a consumer may be taking.</p>
<p>Bethel 30, green capsules are marketed as a Natural Herb for Weight Loss manufactured with a pharmaceutical &amp; Nutraceuticals laboratory. Bethel 30 Herb Supplement is packaged in plastic white bottles containing 30 capsules per bottle and bears Lot #’s 120514, with EXP: 12/05/2014.</p>
<p>The lot 120514 is the only one subject to recall and it will not be distributed through <a href="http://www.bethel30.com1" rel="nofollow">http://www.bethel30.com1</a>, or retail in office.</p>
<p>The product was sold directly to individual customers in our New York, NY, sales office and online at <a href="http://www.bethel30.com2" rel="nofollow">http://www.bethel30.com2</a>. The company discontinued total distribution. It sincerely regrets any inconvenience to our customers.</p>
<p>No illnesses or injuries have been reported to the company to date in connection with this product.</p>
<br /> Tagged: <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/fda/'>FDA</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/recall/'>recall</a>, <a href='http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/tag/weight-loss/'>weight loss</a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11332/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/usfoodsafety.wordpress.com/11332/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.usfoodsafety.com&#038;blog=4878133&#038;post=11332&#038;subd=usfoodsafety&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.usfoodsafety.com/2013/06/12/weight-loss-pills-recalled-for-sibutramine-a-consumer-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/71db1f8698ef11f2d733256f95e306f7?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">foodsafeguru</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
